Veterans For Peace Chapter 111
  • Home
  • Tipping the Scale Blog
  • Events and Announcements
  • CO Program
  • Media
  • Contacts
  • Mission
  • Chapter Minutes
  • Chapter Bylaws
  • Charter
  • Newsletters
  • Newsletters

Practice Small, Daily Acts Of Sabotage Against The Imperial Machine

6/30/2025

0 Comments

 
Caitlin Johnstone
June 29, 2025

Picture
Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):
Do something every day to help undermine public perception of the empire.

Draw attention to its abuses in places like Gaza.

Get people laughing at its absurdities and hypocrisies.

Spread distrust in the imperial propaganda services known as the western press by spotlighting their deceptions and manipulations.

Help people to recognize all the ways their government is screwing them over for the benefit of the rich and powerful.

Facilitate the collective dawning of the realization that everything westerners have been taught about their society and their world is a lie.

Help people to understand that it really, truly does not need to be this way.

Use every means at your disposal to help open up the next pair of eyelids to the ugly reality of the empire.

Cultivate a habit of daily acts of sabotage against the imperial machine. There is always something you can do.

You cannot defeat the machine by yourself, but you can do something every day to help tilt our society’s collective consciousness toward tearing it down together.

❖
Picture
❖

I still can’t get over how we’re being asked to pretend “Death, death to the IDF” is some kind of hate crime at the exact same time IDF soldiers are telling the Israeli press they’re being ordered to massacre starving civilians at aid sites.

I’ve been seeing a number of people arguing that it’s wrong to say “death to the IDF” because soldiers aren’t to be blamed for the criminality of their government. This framing is only accepted in the west because western soldiers also do evil things that our society needs to make up excuses for.

As an aside, “Death, death to the IDF” is an insanely catchy earworm. Been dancing around in my mind all day.

❖

Deliberately starving a civilian population and then setting up aid sites as a death trap to massacre starving people trying to get food is too evil to wrap your mind around. If we saw a supervillain doing this in a movie we’d think it was dumb, because it wouldn’t be believable.

❖

It’s like everyone’s standing around watching a man beat a small child to death at a restaurant.

“Should we do something?” someone asks.

“You saw the kid throw food at the guy,” someone replies. “The man has a right to defend himself.”

“But he’s killing him!”

“It’s a fight. Bad things happen in a fight.”

“Yeah, the boy shouldn’t have started a fight he can’t win.”

“You’re actually being quite hateful right now.”

And sure, maybe it’s true the child did set the man off by throwing food at him.
Maybe the child did so fully knowing that it would send the man into a murderous rage, because the man had been horrifically abusing the child his entire life.

Maybe instigating a physical confrontation in full view of the public was the child’s last desperate attempt to expose the man’s depravity, in the hope that everyone would finally see what’s happening and do something to stop the abuse.

But nobody’s stopping it, because the man has spent years charming and befriending everyone in town — or frightening and intimidating them if that’s easier.

So now everyone’s watching a grown man beat a child to death and pretending they’re watching a fight, when they all know deep down what they’re really watching is a cold-blooded murder by a cold-hearted man, who should have been stopped and locked away a long time ago.

❖

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency is saying that Iran could probably start enriching uranium again within a few months, which Iran has said it plans to do, and which Trump has said will result in another US bombing assault.

Trumpers tried to argue that the bombing of Iran was a brilliant strategic maneuver to avoid full-scale war, when it appears to have only made such a war much more likely. Now the president is saying he’ll bomb Iran again if it resumes enriching uranium, something it will probably be able to do quite soon, after giving Iran every reason to start actively seeking a nuclear weapon.

When Iran hawks were arguing against the JCPOA (the Iran nuclear deal laid out during the Obama administration), one of their most common talking points was that it was “kicking the can down the road” to a nuclear-armed Iran in the future.

In reality the JCPOA was a
remarkable feat of international diplomacy that could have avoided all these needless escalations, and it is Trump and the Iran hawks who have been kicking the can down the road to full-scale war with Iran (if Iran doesn’t get nukes first).

There’s a lot to despise Trump for, but spending both of his terms setting the US on a trajectory toward war with Iran ranks right up around the top of the list. The JCPOA was working fine, but Trump shredded it in 2018 to set us on this path that is only getting darker and darker at a faster and faster pace. Trump chose that course of action to implement his “maximum pressure campaign” on Iran. Trump chose to assassinate Soleimani. Trump chose to bomb Iran. Everything that happens from here on out is Trump’s fault.
0 Comments

How Much Is Your US State Paying for Israel’s Weapons? This New Tool Will Tell You

6/28/2025

0 Comments

 
Where do our tax dollars go?
US Campaign for Palestinian Rights
Picture
The interactive tool on militaryaidtoisrael.org can disclose to Americans just how much they are paying each year for weapons to Israel and what programmes could be funded instead to benefit their state. For a deeper dive, citizens and activists can find out the annual allocation of military aid to Israel by Congressional district, county and even city.

“This map will be a tool to help activists pass local city council resolutions to end US weapons to Israel and redirect that money to unmet community needs, thereby furthering this process.”

Picture
0 Comments

The United States Cannot Defeat Iran

6/27/2025

0 Comments

 
William Schryver
June 27, 2025

Picture
How soon people have forgotten that, earlier this year, the US dispatched two carrier strike groups and a half-dozen B-2s (and other USAF assets) to disarm the Yemeni and open the selectively blockaded Red Sea.

They failed. Abysmally. For the second time!

First of all, in 2024, the USS Brave Sir Robin (CVN-69), USS Teddy Bear (CVN-71), and USS Fraidy Abe (CVN-72) gave it a try, only to eventually run away with their tail between their legs. The Brave Sir Robin left behind an F/A-18 at the bottom of the sea.

They were followed up by the USS Trembling Puppy (CVN-75) and the USS Timid Vinny (CVN-70). But they fared no better, with the Trembling Puppy losing two additional F/A-18 fighters over the course of its traumatic tour of the northern Red Sea.

And, not only did the Yemeni increase their score of MQ-9 Reaper drones to 23, they also targeted and credibly threatened both F-35s and B-2s, such that both platforms were summarily withdrawn from the fight for fear of one getting shot down.

Remember, Yemen is absolutely the bottom rung on the escalatory ladder of formidable adversaries.

Anyone who seriously believes the US Navy can operate in Iranian waters is just plain delusional.

Even if no ships got damaged or sunk, they'd still run out of munitions in a couple weeks or less — and they sure as hell won't be able to reload in Bahrain.

As for an air campaign ... well, I have yet to see any persuasive evidence that US/Israeli aircraft penetrated Iranian airspace to any appreciable extent in Act I of this war. Consequently, I am dubious that Iranian medium- and long-range air defenses were even used.

There is also zero credible evidence of top-shelf Iranian air defenses being destroyed.

From all indications, the Iranians were shooting down Israel's big strike drones with short-range AD. And they shot down several.

The Israeli long-range air-launched ballistic missiles were apparently effective, but they simply don't have very many of them, and as the war progressed into its second week, we saw fewer and fewer of them with each passing day.

In any case, when Act II of this war gets started (and it won't be long), it will almost certainly entail penetration of Iranian airspace. And we will see not only the emergence of Iranian long-range AD, but I strongly suspect Russian and/or Chinese mobile air defense systems will suddenly appear on the battlefield.

Those whose calculus of a US/Iran war assumes overwhelming American air superiority will abruptly find the parameters of their equations altered.

The Russians and Chinese are not going to stand idly by and watch the US smash up their important southwest Asia ally in the rapidly emerging multipolar world.

And keep in mind: the US simply cannot logistically sustain a high-intensity air campaign for more than 2-3 weeks. And if even a dozen or so manned US aircraft are shot down, and a couple ships severely damaged ... well, that will cause such overwhelming consternation in Washington that it might even result in a coup d'état, or something closely approximating one.


Read William Schryver in Substack.
0 Comments

Iranian women truly feel liberated after being bombed by American female B2 pilot

6/27/2025

0 Comments

 
This is what progress looks like...

Laura and Normal Island News
June 27, 2025

Picture
As we all know, the biggest concern of the US and Israel when they illegally bombed Iran, risking a humanitarian catastrophe, and potentially World War III, was the liberation of Iranian women. And gays. We are also pretending to care about the gays.... What? Don't look at me like that!

In hugely exciting news, it turns out a pilot of one of the B2 Spirits that bombed Iran's nuclear sites was a woman, sorry, I mean girl boss.

After hearing news of the girl boss, the liberal media was careful to focus on the most important point: that Pete Hegseth failed to give the female pilot credit for her war crime and only credited "the boys".

The difference between liberal and conservative media is that liberal journalists think genocides should be inclusive whereas conservatives tend to think it is still a man's game. Clearly, this view is outdated.

As a conservative pseudo-feminist, I can't see how our liberation of Iran's women can be taken seriously unless we allow our women to participate in the bombing frenzy. I wish I was...

Excitingly, I'm told the bomb dropped by the girl boss was pink to send a powerful message to Iran's women that we are with you. Sadly, someone forgot to include glitter so the gays felt left out. Oh well, there's always next time...

The powerful feminist gesture has not escaped the attention of Iran's women who have been crying out for white saviours. "Truly, we have been liberated!" they shrieked as the morality police beat them. "One day, we all hope to be bombed by a girl boss."

Iran is a brutal theocracy that punishes women who don't adhere to a strict interpretation of Islam, unlike the US which jails women because Jesus doesn't like abortions. The US is so progressive it forces children who were raped by their father, and women who are clinically braindead, to give birth.

Iran's disgraceful record on women's rights includes having a higher level of female literacy than the US and double the number of female scientists. Sensibly, Israel has been taking out those scientists in targeted assassinations, the liberating kind.

Israel's illegal and unprovoked war truly deserves a Nobel Peace Prize because it has liberated hundreds of Iranian women... by killing them. It gets even better: 16 of the Israeli pilots who attacked Iran were female.

Yay, equality! x

Read Laura and Normal Island News on Substack
0 Comments

June 26th, 2025

6/26/2025

0 Comments

 
Francesca Albanese joins Chris Hedges to break down the current starvation campaign in Gaza, and her upcoming report detailing the profiteering corporations capitalizing on the erasure of Palestinians.

Chris Hedges
June 25, 2025

This interview is also available on podcast platforms and Rumble.

There is not much more that can be said about the unfathomable levels of devastation the genocide in Gaza has reached. Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, has been chronicling the genocide and joins host Chris Hedges on this episode of The Chris Hedges Report to shed light on the current situation in Gaza, including parts from her upcoming report on the profiteers of the genocide.

Israel’s siege on the Palestinians is leaving the population starving, and Albanese lambasts other nations for not stepping up and completing their obligations under international law. “[Countries] have an obligation not to aid, not to assist, not to trade with Israel, not to send weapons, not to buy weapons, not to provide military technology, not to buy military technology. This is not an act of charity that I'm asking you. This is your obligation,” she explains.
Albanese compares Gaza and Israel’s siege to a concentration camp, stating it is unsustainable but also allows the world to witness how a Western settler colonial entity functions. “There is a global awareness of something that has for a long time been a prerogative, a painful prerogative of the global majority, the Global South, meaning the awareness of the pain and the wounds of colonialism,” Albanese tells Hedges.

In her forthcoming report, Albanese will detail exactly how Palestine has been exploited by the global capitalist system and will highlight the role certain corporations have played in the genocide. “[T]here are corporate entities, including from Palestine-friendly states, who have for decades made businesses and made profits out of the economy of the occupation, because Israel has always exploited Palestinian land and resources and Palestinian life,” she says.

“The profits have continued and even increased as the economy of the occupation transformed into an economy of genocide.”
0 Comments

The Burial Plan

6/25/2025

0 Comments

 
Did the US take out the Fordo nuclear complex for good?

Seymour Hersh
June 25, 2025

Picture
Maxar Satellite Imagery collected on the morning of June 22 shows extensive damage at the Fordo underground complex. Several large craters are visible across the ridge, and a wide area is covered in grey-blue ash, consistent with airstrike aftermath. / Satellite image (c) 2025 Maxar Technologies.
I have been told that the destruction of Iran’s cache of enriched uranium at Fordo, a secluded base tucked into a mountainside 120 miles south of Tehran, has been at the top of the American and Israeli governments’ target list since the last few months of the Biden administration. The Israeli question was: how to get to and destroy the storage site and the high-end centrifuges spinning away 260 to 300 feet below the surface.

A White House team working closely with Israelis struggled with that issue throughout the first months of the Trump administration. Everyone involved supported the Israeli insistence that Fordo had to be eliminated. The solution that became policy—blockading any entrance to the nuclear site—arose because one member of the secret group remembered what he had learned, perhaps in college, about Schliemann’s Trench in Turkey.

Heinrich Schliemann was a wealthy German amateur archeologist who spent nearly twenty years in the late nineteenth century trying to find the ruins of Troy. He was convinced they were buried in the hills near Hissarlik, Turkey. Stymied by rocks and debris at his immediate target, he carved a huge 56-foot-deep and 230-foot-wide gash in the side of an adjacent hill until he hit bedrock. In the process he destroyed much of what turned out to be part of the original walls of Troy.

The member of the joint American-Israeli study group brought Schliemann’s folly to his colleagues. Why not deal with the buried Israeli nuclear materials not by trying to bomb the working site—even the US’s feared bunker-buster bombs would not be effective at the depth of the nuclear complex at Fordo—but by repeatedly striking the entrances and air holes there until there could be no way in or out. In other words, avoid an attack plan that had little chance of working and instead seal the Iranian centrifuges and the store of enriched uranium.

Studies at the time demonstrated that US bunker busters, even if precisely targeted, could not get within 60 feet of the depth needed. As a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran was accurately reporting the constantly growing amount of uranium enriched to 60 percent—now fixed at 900 pounds—that was generated and stored at Fordo. Twenty pounds of uranium enriched to 90 percent is enough for one bomb. It would take days, not weeks, at Fordo to enrich its uranium from 60 percent to weapons grade.

It was finally decided the US armada of bombers and attack planes, when it did get the presidential order to attack, would not try to penetrate Iran’s nuclear enrichment area but would aim its bunker busters—at least thirteen of them—at the mountain. All of the known entry ways and air tubes that reached above ground were directly targeted, leaving a huge amount of rubble above the working levels that would be nearly impossible to penetrate.

None of the US bombs was meant to strike the enriched-uranium storage facility or the centrifuges spinning away. The measure of success came later when American sensors reported no increase in the atmospheric radiation levels after the attack. Iran’s uranium was intact and simply buried.

America’s newspapers and cable news shows have been filled with reports, said to be based on a five-page preliminary after-action analysis by the Defense Intelligence Agency, stating that Iran's nuclear capability was perhaps not eliminated by the US raid, but only set back for several months. The DIA’s analysis, if cited correctly, is impossible to credit simply because the total isolation at Fordo of Iran's only known supply of enriched uranium means that the ability to fabricate a nuclear warhead, if Iran’s leadership chose to do so, has been grievously impaired. Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium may be intact, but it will be impossible to reach for many years, if ever. The US bunker-busters accomplished their mission at Fordo.

At no time, I was told, was the US bombing assault aimed at elements of the Iranian leadership. It was not a decapitation mission, but a modern version of Schliemann’s attempt to reach the hidden remains of Troy by coming at them from what he thought would be an easier and much safer access point. Only this time the folly was intentional.

I was told that some members of the Israeli delegation to the talks had second thoughts almost immediately about the fact that the centrifuges and enriched uranium would be left untouched by the US strike. How could Washington be sure that in some future moment the Iranians wouldn’t find a way to burrow through the rocks and debris and reach the stored uranium? Everyone involved was aware that enriched uranium would take hundreds of millions of years to decay to the point where it’s no longer radioactive.

The Israelis cited the famed rescue of thirty-three miners in Chile who were trapped nearly half a mile underground in 2010 for sixty-nine days when a copper and gold mine collapsed. The world was entranced as the miners were brought to the surface, one by one, in a specially designed capsule. It took weeks of preparation before a rescue shaft was created. Even NASA was brought in to consult.

The Israeli question was obvious: the US attack plan would leave the vital Iranian nuclear complex intact, but locked in, presumably for eons. But couldn’t a future Iranian team find a way to burrow its way through the debris, reach the stored uranium, and recover enough for one or two bombs. If Chile could find a way, why not Iran?

I was told that the Israelis asked the Trump administration “just how much was America committed to keeping [the enriched uranium] underground?” The Israeli concern increased as Trump was pushing, without immediate success, for permanent ceasefire talks.

What it will take for Trump to want peace talks may not be enough for Israel—especially because the Israelis may have their own interpretation of the message of Schliemann’s Trench: Be sure to let the dead stay buried.
0 Comments

Why Limit Iranian Enrichment Peacefully When You Can Bomb Them Instead?

6/24/2025

0 Comments

 
A deal was limiting Iran’s enrichment of uranium until Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of it. Instead the Dealmaker bombed Iran, threatening to set the region on fire, writes Joe Lauria. With a ceasefire what does he do now?
Picture
Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant before U.S. attack.. (LANCE FIRMS operated by NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) with funding provided by NASA Headquarters.)
In the last great achievement of international diplomacy, the United States and its allies Britain, France and Germany, concluded a deal in 2015 with Russia, China and Iran — something that today would be unthinkable — to limit Iran’s nuclear enrichment to purely civilian uses at 3.67 percent. 

Negotiations on the deal began in November 2013, just three months before the U.S.-backed unconstitutional change of government in Kiev that started the long slide in U.S.-Russian relations. That did not prevent the nuclear deal from being concluded in July 2015 and endorsed by the Security Council in October of that year.
 

Seven years later, Washington and its European allies began  fighting a hot war against Moscow through its proxy Ukraine. Relations with China have also sharply deteriorated. The idea of such cooperation on Iran now is unthinkable.

But in 2013 such wise diplomacy was still possible and the result was a peaceful resolution of the Iranian enrichment issue.

Iran agreed to stringent monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency and in exchange, the United States, Europe and the United Nations lifted economic sanctions against Tehran.
 

The IAEA certified that the deal was working. Iran was sticking to 3.67 percent enrichment. Diplomacy worked. Iran’s nuclear program was in check.

But the Israelis had opposed it all along because Israel’s aim has long been to overthrow the government in Iran in Israel’s quest for regional dominance.
  

Netanyahu could not stop Barack Obama from working with the Chinese and the Russians to conclude the deal that solved the nuclear issue and left the Iranian government in a more secure position. 
Then Donald Trump became president. He did what Netanyahu wanted. He pulled the U.S. out of the deal, saying it was a lousy agreement and he could do better.

But there was no new deal.  Iran continued to cooperate with the existing agreement for a year before increasing enrichment, eventually to 60 percent (90 percent is needed for a bomb).


Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden, did nothing to return the U.S. to the deal to save it when he got into the White House, dishonoring probably Obama’s greatest achievement.

Trump 2.0’s idea of a better deal to limit Tehran’s enrichment was to demand zero percent after Iran agreed to return to 3.67 percent. Trump would look like a fool if he accepted 3.67 percent, as that would mean agreeing to the very deal that was working well before he tore it up.
 

So it was bombs away instead.

 

Read Joe Lauria on Consortium News.
0 Comments

Trump yelling 'ceasefire' doesn't mean 'ceasefire'.

6/24/2025

0 Comments

 
A narcissistic US President thinking he runs the world while Iran and the Resistance Axis are proving him wrong time and time again.

Vanessa Beeley
June 24, 2025

Picture
Points about the alleged US-Iran-Israel ceasefire that Trump is yelling about on X. These points are just me thinking out loud - feel free to add your opinions:

  1. Ceasefires are never honoured by Israel or the US. See Lebanon, Palestine, violations of demarcation zone in Syria etc. Israel is a consumer more than a producer of weapons. Iran is a producer more than a consumer. Ceasefires are an opportunity for Israel to replenish stocks with US allied help. The war is far from over.
  2. Israel also needs to rest its pilots, service the fighter jets and attend to the failings in the multi-layer air defence systems. Iran needs more time than Israel to address the damage from the first stage of the war. This is not to diminish the damage done to Israel by Iran - this is also considerable, but Israel has an entire cohort of powerful countries that will leap to its assistance.
Read complete analysis on Substack.
0 Comments

A Prime Time Breach in the National Narrative, on Fox!

6/23/2025

0 Comments

 
"We’ve seen this playbook before — and Americans always pay the price."

Gene Marx
June 21, 2025

During the waning days of the Biden administration, humor was in short supply. So, between Covid lockdowns and missile strikes, I was in dire need of a few smiles. Well, I’m a curious guy, and Fox’s Gutfeld! was riding high in the late night ratings, so I thought I’d give it a shot.

Outperforming other late-night talk shows in the ratings and with a politically diverse audience - the all-important 25-54 demographic, Independents, Democrats, Republicans, even orphaned Progressives like me - Gutfeld! has consistently averaged more than 3 million viewers a night. While late night laughs were still limited, regular panelist, libertarian comedian and author, Kat Timpf, continued to win me over with her no-nonsense, satirical take on current events.
Picture
Comic/author Kat Timpf
Returning to the show this week after a recent cancer scare and the birth of her son in January, Kat Timpf still lights up each episode, easily outshining her mostly MAGA-leaning co-panelists, but never more so than Tuesday night when she went off message, unapologetically calling for the United States to avoid another costly conflict in the Middle East, leaving the pro-Israel panelists either visibly surprised or scowling.

I don't see any reason for us to be involved. And the reason that Iran is bad is not a reason for us to get involved or that things would even get better if we did get involved. You look at Libya, you look at Afghanistan, you look at Iraq, you look at Syria. Didn't go so well for us.
I don't see any reason for us to be involved. And the reason that Iran is bad is not a reason for us to get involved or that things would even get better if we did get involved. You look at Libya, you look at Afghanistan, you look at Iraq, you look at Syria. Didn't go so well for us.
The drumbeat for war was obviously getting personal for Kat. Recently married to Cameron Friscia, a former Army Ranger who served in Afghanistan, and now the mother of a four-month old baby boy, things were hitting too close to home.
I don't want anyone's son to have to go die for another country's war, including my own. Even though he's only four months old, based on our history in this region, it could very much still be a concern by the time that he turns 18. OK? And I know that people are saying we're just going to get in and get out. I don't see any reason to believe that.
The United States maintains a considerable military presence in the Middle East, with forces totaling more than 40,000 in more than a dozen countries and on ships throughout the region’s waters, all tripwires for escalation. A run-up to a possible war on Iran is part of a playbook Timpf’s seen before, like most of us. 
It was just so sahweet to see this terse, Prime time narrative fissure on a neocon war propaganda operation like Fox News…laughs or no laughs.
0 Comments

I'll Slug You, and If You Resist, I'll Slug You Harder

6/23/2025

0 Comments

 
U.S. Strategy in Iran

Bill Astore
June 22, 2025

U.S. messaging to Iran, courtesy of President Trump, is quite simple: We slugged you (with our bombing attacks on three nuclear sites in your country), and if you don’t like it, we’ll slug you again, even harder, much, much harder.
Picture
Iran’s only real choice: “unconditional surrender,” according to the president.

Well, it’s a strategy, I suppose, the one of the abuser, the bully. Do what I want, else you’ll get slugged. Try to fight back, I’ll slug you much much harder. Oh, by the way, I believe in peace. And you can have peace by totally capitulating to me.

Another way of looking at or labeling this stategy: Bombing for Bibi. Yes, I know it’s not just Bibi Netanyahu behind it all. But he’s the chief flatterer, the skilled string-puller, the master manipulator of Trump. Not that it’s entirely hard to manipulate a narcissist who’s driven by money and consumed by his own ego.

So, we have to look to Iran to show a measure of restraint, since the U.S. and Israel won’t. If Iran chooses to fight, especially to hit back at U.S. targets in the region, all bets are off as our country stumbles into what could become World War III.

As Jimmy Dore put it today, No matter who you vote for, you get John McCain. A warmonger. Someone proud to joke about bombing Iran—and crazy enough to do it. Does it really matter if the warmonger is named Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden—or Donald Trump?

Congress, no surprise, is almost entirely behind Trump’s attack, despite some griping and sniping from the sidelines. Congress may complain, but it’s just posturing. That’s how you get reckless wars of choice that are unsupported by the American people.

Oh well. “We love you, God,” as Trump said last night as he announced the bombings. I never learned in CCD that God loves bombs and bombing; I must have been sleeping or absent for that one. Thou shalt kill, right?
0 Comments
<<Previous
    The VFP-111 Tipping the Scale blog is not an elite space, reserved for experts or professional bloggers. This is a blog for real people who are willing to share themselves honestly and vulnerably.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly