Veterans For Peace Chapter 111
  • Home
  • Tipping the Scale Blog
  • Events and Announcements
  • CO Program
  • Media
  • Contacts
  • Mission
  • Chapter Minutes
  • Chapter Bylaws
  • Charter
  • Newsletters

I'm Already Against the Next War

3/21/2025

0 Comments

 
Reflections on Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan

Bill Astore
March 20, 2025

I’ve been reading John Ketwig’s memoir “…and a hard rain fell: A GI’s true story of the War in Vietnam,” and it’s reminding me just how plain dumb, destructive, and duplicitous America’s wars have been since World War II.

America’s wars are always dressed up with a necessary, even allegedly noble, cause. In Vietnam, we had to stop communism and all those dominoes from falling. In Iraq, it was about WMD and stopping Saddam Hussein, “the next Hitler.” In Afghanistan, it was about vengeance for 9/11, then creating democracy and even helping women. (How about helping women in America? Never mind.)

Vietnam is nominally communist today—and a big trading partner of the U.S. and an ally of sorts against China. No dominoes fell. Iraq didn’t have WMD and Saddam wasn’t the next Hitler; he was merely a regional strongman and a former U.S. ally who got a little too big for his britches, especially for Israel. Afghanistan was a war in search of a clear mission and attainable goals. After twenty years of effort and roughly $2 trillion in expenditures, the U.S. replaced the Taliban with—the Taliban. (I heard Norman Finkelstein say this first.)

Picture
We’re always told versions of the same lie: We need to fight them over there so that we don’t have to fight them here. Communism had to be rolled back in Vietnam else commies would be landing in Manhattan. Iraq had to be pummeled and Saddam overthrown before WMD landed in Boston. Afghanistan had to be pacified and modernized before the Taliban enforced conservative Sharia law in Biloxi.

None of this was true. The United States would have been perfectly safe without committing any troops to Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. In fact, the U.S. would have been far better off if those wars had never been fought. Certainly Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan would have been far better off if they’d never become free-fire zones for American munitions (including the poisonous Agent Orange in Vietnam and, more recently, depleted uranium and other poisons in Iraq and Afghanistan).

Read complete article in Substack.


0 Comments

CIA Historian Admits There Was a 'Cover-Up' Following JFK Assassination

3/20/2025

0 Comments

 
The CIA’s own in-house historian David Robarge concluded that director John A. McCone and Richard Helms engaged in a “benign coverup” that concealed important information from the Warren Commission.

Jon Miltimore
March 20, 2025

Picture
On Tuesday evening, the Trump administration released of thousands of pages of government documents concerning the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The move was prompted by an order by President Trump directing agencies to disclose their JFK files.

So far, The New York Times notes, the release of the documents has offered “few revelations.” Whether that will change remains to be seen.

One of the most prominent conspiracy theories in history is the idea that the CIA played a role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

As Scott Sayare pointed out in a 2023 New York magazine article, the idea of CIA involvement was born almost immediately after the 6.5×52mm Carcano 160 gr copper-jacketed bullet tore through JFK’s skull on Nov. 22, 1963.
The possibility of such a tie had been floated since almost the moment Kennedy was shot. The mutual detestation between Kennedy and the Agency, especially after the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion, was widely known in Washington. It is a measure of the paranoia of the era, and also of the Agency’s reputation for lawlessness, that on the afternoon of his brother’s murder, Robert Kennedy summoned the director of the CIA to his home to ask “if they” — the CIA — “had killed my brother,” Kennedy later recalled. (The director, John McCone, said they had not.)
Anyone who flirts with the idea that the US security state played a role in JFK’s death risks being branded a conspiracy theorist today, which is likely why so few talk about the possibility publicly—even though the president’s own brother and prominent world leaders had their suspicions.


Finish article on Substack.
0 Comments

Government clarifies Israel is, but isn't, but possibly, maybe, could be at risk of breaking international law

3/19/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture

This means it's fine to send Israel bombs

Laura

and
Normal Island News
Mar 19, 2025

You could be forgiven for being confused after David Lammy accidentally admitted Israel is breaking international law, only to be undermined by Downing Street and his own office.

The foreign secretary was questioned by anti-genocide lunatic Jeremy Corbyn and gave him a propaganda victory by telling an inaccurate truth. This was most embarrassing. The last thing we need is people with a conscience saying: “I told you so”.

The Hamas-run Corbyn asked the foreign secretary to confirm that Israel’s blockade and continued bombardment of Gaza are violations of international law, and the foreign secretary…panicked.

Lammy forgot the official line that Israel is, but isn’t, but maybe, possibly, could be doing things we might disapprove of, that maybe, possibly risk breaking international law if they’re not careful, but something, something, Hamas, rape, October 7th. It’s important that our ministers talk with such clarity, otherwise the public might think they’re accomplices in genocide.

Just because Israel is illegally blocking aid into Gaza and cutting off the power in breach of international law does not mean Israel is breaching international law. This is a grey area because we don’t like the law being applied to Israel.

The government is in a difficult position because Israel has kompromat and the arms manufacturers are making money and the International Criminal Court is weighing up arrest warrants. You think you could do a better job of striking a balance here?

Lammy was at least sensible enough to explain Israel has a right to defend itself from civilians who have nothing to do with the conflict.

As a qualified lawyer, Lammy finds he is easily confused by legal matters, a problem that happens to also afflict the prime minister. The pair agree that when Hamas breaks international law, civilians must be murdered in response, and when Israel breaks international law, sanctions must not be imposed in response. Consistency is important.

Thanks to consistency from the UK, and support from the US, Israel was able to end the ceasefire with a bombing spree that killed two children every minute. Americans are delighted to pay for this because the only welfare queens they oppose are single mothers with hungry kids.

Israel resumed its genocide because it has every right to defend itself from ceasefires. Just know it was Hamas who caused this by attacking Israel zero times. Israel was forced to act when it saw children on their own land in clear violation of the agreement that Israel had already broken 89 times.

Israel decided Hamas could not go to parts of Gaza and when it saw Palestinians in those parts, it bombed them because it sees all Palestinians as Hamas, even toddlers. Ordinary Palestinians are not responsible for Hamas and Hamas is not responsible for them, but we’re gonna act like the reverse is true because how else would we justify this? Oh yeah, the hostages…

The agreement was that Hamas would release the next 59 hostages during the second phase of the ceasefire, but Israel refused to move to the second phase until the hostages were released because it didn’t want them to be released.

Let’s forget the Israeli delegation admitted on February 9th, it would not advance to the second phase of ceasefire talks. Let’s forget Israel planned to end the ceasefire one week before Hamas did whatever it is they’re accusing Hamas of doing this time. By the way, Israel is still holding over 9,000 Palestinian hostages which it does not plan to release at any stage. Why is Hamas like this?

Just know the hostage situation is good for Netanyahu’s political survival because the last thing Israelis want is an end to genocide. Israel attacks Gaza during times of peace and times of war, and even during ceasefires, and sometimes Palestinians respond by killing on a smaller scale. This proves Israel is right to always be attacking Gaza.

Did you know we’re still accusing Hamas of mass rape on October 7th? Well, you bloody well should because we remind you about it every 15 seconds!

A UN report shows Israel is weaponising rape in the occupied territories, but if you talk about this, you’re abandoning Israel’s women. An Israeli government watchdog admits the IDF sexually abuses its own conscripts in huge numbers. You should stand in solidarity with the one-in-four Israelis who’ve been sexually abused by their own side, but only if you find a way to blame Hamas. Israel has every right to rape itself.

Rape is the worst crime imaginable when we’re making evidence-free accusations against Palestinians, but when Israel’s figures show its own side raping, it’s misogyny to mention this. We do not amplify the truth about Israel under any circumstances. Thankfully, our ministers are on the right side of history which is why they prefer to talk about imaginary beheaded babies.

Reassuringly, Liz Kendall said that while no one wants Palestinians to be slaughtered, a ceasefire would be wrong because Hamas might kill Israelis in much smaller numbers. Israeli lives are more valuable than Palestinian lives, therefore, the moral thing to do is kill large numbers of Palestinians. This is the type of reasoning you get when you elect someone who culls disabled people to balance the books.

Labour’s other demon, Pat McFadden, said the government would use “every diplomatic lever” to restore the ceasefire in Gaza, apart from sanctioning Israel, or banning arms sales to Israel, or ending surveillance flights for Israel, or accusing Israel of breaking international law, or supporting the International Criminal Court’s action against Israel, or banning donations to politicians from the Israeli lobby. Apart from all of that, the British government plans to use every diplomatic lever possible…
0 Comments

A Revealing Poll by NBC News Tells People How and What to Think

3/17/2025

0 Comments

 
Forget about peace or reductions to military spending

Bill Astore
March 17, 2025


According to an NBC News poll, America is rooting for Ukraine but Trump prefers Russia. Seriously.
That’s the gist of the headline.


The intent of this poll wasn’t to analyze how Americans think about the Russia-Ukraine War or Trump or military strength. It was to control how they think by giving them only the most constrained choices.

Let’s take a close look at the results and the NBC headline. According to NBC News:
When asked where they believe Trump’s sympathies are, 49% choose Russia, 40% say they think Trump favors neither side, and 8% choose Ukraine. Another 3% say they are not sure.
So, a majority of Americans, 51%, believe Trump is either carefully neutral on the war, a Ukraine supporter, or they don’t know. A minority (49%) believes he sympathizes with Russia. But the headline says Americans believe “Trump prefers Russia.”
Picture
The photo that accompanies the NBC article shows Trump lecturing Zelensky.
Interestingly, I see no question about whether the Russia-Ukraine War should end after three long and bloody years so that lives are saved, or whether the U.S. should stop sending billions in weaponry to Ukraine with virtually no oversight as to where the weapons end up.
Finish article on Bracing Views.
0 Comments

Chris Hedges: On the Precipice of Darkness

3/17/2025

0 Comments

 
Normalizing genocide and the new world order.

Chris Hedges
March 15, 2025

This was a talk I gave at the Sanctuary for Independent Media. Thank you to them for hosting me, and allowing my team to upload this talk I gave to The Chris Hedges Report. Visit their YouTube channel, where this originally aired, here.

0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>
    The VFP-111 Tipping the Scale blog is not an elite space, reserved for experts or professional bloggers. This is a blog for real people who are willing to share themselves honestly and vulnerably.

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

Proudly powered by Weebly